Albato Pricing Explained: Plans, Transactions, Real Costs and Which Option Is Right for You

Current Plan and Cost Guide

Albato Pricing Explained: Plans, Transactions, Real Costs and Which Option Is Right for You

Albato’s 2026 pricing is easier to understand once you separate two things: the plan defines how you work, while the transaction package defines how much automation volume you use. That distinction matters more than the headline monthly price.

Pricing and terms checked September 8, 2026
Affiliate disclosure: This guide contains affiliate links. Northryn may earn a commission if you sign up or purchase through them at no extra cost to you. Affiliate availability does not determine the recommendations.
Evidence note: Pricing and transaction rules were checked against Albato’s official pricing and Help Center pages. Northryn also completed hands-on testing of a Google Sheets automation using a trigger, filter and output step, including a positive run, a filtered negative case and a controlled error/recovery test.
Free $0 100 transactions
Pro monthly $22/mo 1K transactions selected
Pro annual $15/mo 1K transactions selected
Teams Coming soon From 5K transactions

Quick Answer

Albato starts free, while Pro currently starts at $22/month monthly or $15/month with annual billing for 1K transactions

The important detail is that Albato no longer ties the plan and transaction allowance together as one fixed bundle. You choose a plan, then choose the monthly transaction package that matches your expected usage.

That makes Albato flexible, but it also means the real cost depends on transaction volume. If you run past your package, extra transactions can be purchased automatically at a 50% higher rate than the transactions included in your selected package.

How pricing works

Albato pricing is a two-part model

Albato’s February 2026 pricing change separated plan features from usage volume. This is the core idea to understand before comparing prices.

1. Plan Defines features and collaboration model
+
2. Transaction package Defines monthly automation volume
=
Real cost Your selected plan + transaction usage
Why this matters: Comparing Albato only by its starting price can be misleading. A low-volume workflow can remain inexpensive, while a transaction-heavy workflow should be modeled around realistic monthly usage.

Albato Plans and Current Pricing

Albato currently lists Free, Pro, Teams and Custom. Teams is still marked as coming soon on the live pricing page.

Try first

Free

$0

  • 100 transactions
  • 5 active automations
  • 2 steps per automation
  • Unlimited apps and connections
  • 7-day log storage
  • 15-minute automation updates
Best fit: learning the interface, validating a simple workflow and estimating transaction usage before paying.
Main paid plan

Pro

$22/mo monthly
$15/mo annual billing, 1K selected

  • Unlimited automations and steps
  • Data migration and auto replay
  • Albato AI and AI Agents
  • Parallel scenario execution
  • 30-day logs
  • 5-minute automation updates
  • 1,000+ apps
Best fit: individuals and small teams that need more than basic automation and want to scale transaction volume separately.
Coming soon

Teams

$93/mo monthly
$65/mo annual billing

  • From 5K transactions
  • Teams mode
  • 5 team seats
  • Priority support
  • Shared workspaces and projects
Best fit: agencies and collaboration-focused teams once the plan becomes fully available.
High-volume

Custom

Contact sales

  • Designed for larger or specialized requirements
  • Custom transaction volume
  • Higher-touch support and management options
Best fit: higher-volume or more complex business requirements that do not fit the standard self-service model.
Usage model

What counts as a transaction in Albato?

In practical terms, transactions are the units Albato uses to measure automation execution. The exact count depends on what your automation does, so estimate usage from real runs rather than from the number of automations alone.

01

A workflow is triggered

A new event starts the automation, such as a new Google Sheets row, form submission or webhook.

Think of it as: the automation waking up because something happened.
02

Albato runs the billable work

Filters, actions and other execution steps determine how much usage accumulates in real life.

Cost driver: frequency of runs plus what the automation actually does.
03

Monthly transactions add up

The package is consumed over time, so a simple workflow can still become expensive if it runs often enough.

Decision rule: measure monthly usage from real runs, not assumptions.

Northryn hands-on example

In Northryn’s Albato test, a Google Sheets workflow used a new-row trigger, a filter and a result-writing step. We also tested a negative case stopped by the filter plus a controlled missing-field error followed by recovery.

What changes the real cost

Two workflows can look equally simple but consume very different volumes if one runs far more often, uses more actions or keeps processing records throughout the month.

Do not compare Albato transactions directly with Make credits or Zapier tasks. The accounting units are defined differently by each platform. Compare the cost of the workflow you actually intend to run, not the label attached to the usage unit.

What happens if you exceed your transaction package?

Albato is designed to avoid suddenly stopping an automation when your package is exhausted.

1

Usage gets close to the limit

Albato warns you that your current package is running low.

2

Included transactions run out

If a valid payment method or balance exists, automation can keep running.

3

Extra transactions are added

Albato states these additional transactions cost 50% more than included package transactions.

4

You upgrade the package

Move to a larger package if overages become normal rather than exceptional.

Cost-control rule: Treat automatic extra transactions as a short-term safety net, not as your normal usage model. If overages become recurring, move to a larger package.

Monthly vs Annual Billing

Albato currently advertises up to 30% savings with annual billing, but the better option depends on how certain you are about usage.

Decision factor
Free
Pro Monthly
Pro Annual
Price at 1K
$0No paid commitment
$22/monthMore flexible, higher recurring cost
$15/month equivalentLower recurring cost, longer commitment
Best when
You are still testing fit and measuring usage.
Your workflow is live, but volume may still change.
You already know the automation will stay in regular use.
Main trade-off
Strict usage and automation limits.
Costs more if you keep it long term.
Less flexibility if your usage model changes soon.
Recommendation: Start monthly if your transaction volume is still uncertain. Annual billing makes more sense once your workflow has run long enough to show stable usage.

Which Albato plan fits your workflow?

Choose the plan and transaction package separately. The best setup is the smallest one that supports both your feature requirements and your real execution volume.

Free

Use Free when you are still validating

Best for learning the builder, checking app compatibility and estimating transaction usage.

Watch for: 100 transactions, 5 automations and 2 steps per automation.
Pro

Use Pro when automations become operational

Best for individuals or small teams that need unlimited automations and steps plus scalable transaction volume.

Watch for: model the package size from real monthly runs.
Teams / Custom

Move beyond Pro only when collaboration or scale requires it

Teams is still marked as coming soon, while Custom makes sense when standard self-service pricing no longer fits.

Watch for: current live availability and support requirements.

How Albato pricing compares with Make and Zapier

Albato’s transaction model should not be reduced to a single “cheaper than” claim. Albato, Make and Zapier count usage differently and are best compared through one real workflow.

Albato

Plan capabilities and transaction volume are selected separately.

Best fit: simpler trigger → condition → action workflows with measurable usage.
Pricing logic: plan + selected transaction package.
Northryn view: credible value when workflow complexity stays moderate.

Make

Better suited to visually complex workflows and deeper execution visibility.

Best fit: workflows likely to grow in complexity.
Pricing logic: different usage unit, so direct price-label comparisons can mislead.
Northryn view: stronger for advanced workflow building.

Zapier

Typically easier to start with, but it also follows its own usage and plan structure.

Best fit: guided setup and broad app coverage.
Pricing logic: not directly comparable to Albato transactions.
Northryn view: judge it by the actual workflow you need, not the brand familiarity.
Best comparison method: model one real workflow in each platform, then compare the monthly cost at the execution volume you expect. Avoid comparing only the starting plan price.

For the product-level decision, see Make vs Albato →

Is Albato good value?

Albato can be good value when your workflows are predictable, your transaction usage is measurable and you do not repeatedly spill into higher-cost extra transactions.

Albato is better value when you:

  • Need straightforward no-code automation
  • Can estimate transaction usage reasonably well
  • Want unlimited automations and steps on Pro
  • Prefer simpler trigger → condition → action workflows
  • Can benefit from annual billing once usage stabilizes

Compare alternatives when you:

  • Expect highly complex branching workflows
  • Need deeper visual execution control
  • Have volatile usage that repeatedly creates overages
  • Need collaboration features that are not yet live
  • Cannot estimate usage from real automation runs

Final Recommendation

Start with Free, measure real transaction usage, then move to the smallest Pro package that comfortably fits your workflow

Albato’s pricing is most attractive when you use the flexibility of the new model rather than treating the starting price as the full story.

If your usage is still uncertain, monthly billing gives you room to learn. Once the workflow is stable, annual billing can reduce the recurring cost. Avoid relying on automatic extra transactions as a permanent operating model because they cost 50% more than included transactions.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does Albato cost?

Albato has a Free plan at $0 with 100 transactions. Pro currently starts at $22/month with monthly billing or $15/month equivalent with annual billing when 1K transactions are selected. Higher transaction packages increase the total cost.

Is Albato free?

Yes. Albato’s Free plan currently includes 100 transactions, 5 active automations, 2 steps per automation, unlimited apps and connections, 7-day logs and 15-minute update intervals.

What is an Albato transaction?

A transaction is Albato’s usage unit for automation execution. The number consumed depends on what the automation runs and how often it executes, so measure usage from real workflows rather than from the number of automations alone.

What happens if I exceed my transaction limit?

Albato can automatically purchase additional transactions so automations continue running when a valid payment method or balance is available. Albato states that those additional transactions cost 50% more than the transactions included in your selected package.

Is Albato cheaper with annual billing?

Yes. Albato currently advertises savings of up to 30% with annual billing. For the 1K Pro configuration, the page shows $22/month monthly or $15/month equivalent with annual billing.

Is Albato cheaper than Make?

There is no reliable universal answer because Albato and Make use different pricing and usage units. Compare the cost of the same real workflow at your expected monthly execution volume.

Does Albato have a Teams plan?

Albato currently lists Teams as coming soon. The live page shows $93/month monthly or $65/month equivalent with annual billing, starting from 5K transactions, but availability should be checked before making a purchasing decision.